Abstract
The hypothesis that fast-growing breeds of willow (Salix spp.) are more sensitive to nutrient and water stress and less efficient in nutrient- and water-use than slower-growing natural willow clones was tested. Cuttings of a natural clone of S. viminalis L. collected in Sweden (L78183) and a hybrid clone of S. schwerinii E. Wolf. x S. viminalis L. ("Tora") were grown outdoors in pots under various experimental conditions in a full-factorial design. The experimental conditions included three fertilization, two irrigation and two temperature regimes. Classical growth analysis techniques, based on an initial and a final harvest, were used as a screening method, together with calculation of intrinsic water-use efficiency (foliar carbon isotope ratio; delta13C). In addition, nitrogen-use efficiency was calculated as the product of nitrogen productivity and mean residence time of nitrogen on an annual basis. There were significant differences in plant structural parameters (leaf area ratio, specific leaf area) and water-use efficiency between the clones. Furthermore, several clone x treatment interaction effects on various growth parameters indicated that the clones adapted to specific environments in different ways. "Tora" plants produced up to 25% more shoot biomass than plants of the natural clone in response to high rates of fertilization and irrigation, whereas clone ranking was reversed in most other treatments. The results support the hypothesis that fast-growing hybrids are more sensitive to nutrient and water stress than slower-growing natural clones. The hypothesis that natural clones have higher resource-use efficiency than fast-growing hybrids was supported with respect to water, but not nitrogen.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call