Abstract

Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) therapy has been widely applied in regenerative dentistry, and PRF preparation has been optimized to efficiently form fibrin clots using plain glass tubes. Currently, a shortage of commercially available glass tubes has forced PRF users to utilize silica-coated plastic tubes. However, most plastic tubes are approved by regulatory authorities only for diagnostic use and remain to be approved for PRF therapy. To clarify this issue, we quantified silica microparticles incorporated into the PRF matrix. Blood samples were collected into three different brands of silica-containing plastic tubes and were immediately centrifuged following the protocol for advanced-PRF (A-PRF). Advanced-PRF-like matrices were examined using a scanning electron microscope (SEM), and silica microparticles were quantified using a spectrophotometer. Each brand used silica microparticles of specific size and appearance. Regardless of tube brands and individual donors, significant, but not accidental, levels of silica microparticles were found to be incorporated into the A-PRF-like matrix, which will be consequently incorporated into the implantation sites. Presently, from the increasing data for cytotoxicity of amorphous silica, we cannot exclude the possibility that such A-PRF-like matrices negatively influence tissue regeneration through induction of inflammation. Further investigation should be performed to clarify such potential risks.

Highlights

  • Similar to platelet-rich plasma (PRP), platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) has been demonstrated to be effective in tissue repair/regeneration in various fields of regenerative medicine [1,2,3,4,5]

  • Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) users have recently faced a serious problem where, except for some brands specialized for PRF preparation, major medical equipment manufacturers have discontinued the production of plain glass tubes for blood collection [6]

  • We have recently developed a method using a synthetic collagen-like protein to indirectly stimulate coagulation via activation of platelets and reproducibly prepare a PRF-like matrix [8]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Similar to platelet-rich plasma (PRP), platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) has been demonstrated to be effective in tissue repair/regeneration in various fields of regenerative medicine [1,2,3,4,5]. The major advantages of PRF over PRP are that it does not necessitate superior operator skills, anti-coagulants, Biomedicines 2019, 7, 45; doi:10.3390/biomedicines7020045 www.mdpi.com/journal/biomedicines. Biomedicines 2019, 7, 45 or coagulation factors, implying that fewer sections of the PRF preparation protocol can be biased. The use of standardized blood-collection tubes and centrifuges under the same centrifugal conditions reproducibly prepare similar-quality PRF from the same individuals at the same time points. PRF users have recently faced a serious problem where, except for some brands specialized for PRF preparation, major medical equipment manufacturers have discontinued the production of plain glass tubes for blood collection [6].

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call