Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of several Sorghum bicolor cultivars as forage on a dry land with pH of 5.4, N of 0.08%; C/N of 9%, P of 0.06% and K of 0.01%. Nine cultivars of S. bicolor (Super 1, Super 2, Numbu, Kawali, G2, G5, PAC 537, PAC 593 and PAC 501) were evaluated. Plot size was 16 m2 with space planting of 15 x 75 cm. The experimental design used was randomized block design with three replications. Parameters observed were plant height, time of flowering, forage production and quality. The result showed that the primary plant growth was not different in all cultivars. In the 65 days old primary plant, the Super 2, PAC 537 and Kawali had no flower yet. Biomass production varied in primary plant between cultivars of 11.35 - 26.17 kg/16 m2. The highest biomass production was obtained in PAC 537 of 26.17 kg/16 m2 (16.34 t/ha) which were significantly higher than G2 of 11.35 kg/16 m2 (7.09 ton/ha) and was not significantly different with other cultivars. In the 45 days ratoon I, Super 2, G5 and Super 1 showed faster growth. Biomass production increased in the ratoon I around 19.88 kg/16 m2 (12.42 ton/ha). PAC 537 produced the highest biomass of 30.14 kg/16 m2 (18.84 ton/ha) and was not significantly different with other cultivars, except with the G2. Biomass production of ratoon II decreased around 1.83 kg/16 m2 (1.14 t/ha)–4.77 kg/16 m2 (2.98 t/ha) and increased in the ratoon III of 15.72 kg/16 m2 (9.82 t/ha)–26.05 kg/16 m2 (16.28 t/ha). The quality of forage ratoon I was better compared to the primary plant with the lowest one was in ratoon II. It could be concluded that Super 1, Super 2 and PAC 537 cultivars might be recommended as potential forage.
Highlights
Feed availability for ruminant, especially forage in dry land is highly influenced by season
The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of several Sorghum bicolor cultivars as forage on a dry land with pH of 5.4, N of 0.08%; C/N of 9%, P of 0.06% and K of 0.01%
No significant difference of all the nine cultivars in this study indicates a same response to the climate condition
Summary
Feed availability for ruminant, especially forage in dry land is highly influenced by season. A. JITV Vol 22 No 3 Th. 2017: 135-143 problem commonly faced in ruminant rearing is the unavailability of adequate forage especially in the dry season (Aswar 2005). During the dry season, the quality of forage commonly low with low productivity in the dry land area. The productivity of the elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum) in wet climates area is able to reach 300 tonnes/ ha/year of fresh weight on a fertile land (Prawiradiputra et al 2012). In a dry area with dry climate or in the areas with a relatively long dry season, this grass provides a much lower fresh weight production as about 48-70 tonnes/ha/year. To overcome the forage availability issue, it is necessary to find a multifunctional and easy to adapt to a dry land with dry climate forage
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
