Evaluation of two calibration methods for MRI-based polymer gel dosimetry

Abstract

Polymer gel dosimetry (PGD) can provide three-dimensional (3D) dose data for evaluation of the dose calculation algorithms used by treatment planning systems (TPS). Although the PGD technique, particularly with MRI, is now ready for clinical applications, an accurate calibration method is vital for treatment validation in 3D. This study evaluated the single-phantom electron beam (SPE) method that used the depth-dose data of a 9 MeV electron beam. This technique was compared with the multi-vial x-ray (MVX) method that used nine small vials irradiated with various doses. We tested two regression equations, i.e., third-order polynomial and tangent functions, and two dose-normalization methods, i.e., one-point and two-point methods. These methods were evaluated using a dose distribution generated by a 3 cm × 3 cm open arc beam. We used MAGAT polymer gel manufactured in-house. We found that the SPE method required a smaller dose scaling for the dose comparison. The tangent function showed better data fitting than the polynomial function with smaller uncertainty of the estimated coefficients. We did not observe a distinct advantage of the SPE method over the MVX method for the 3D dose comparison with the test case. From this study, we infer that the SPE method with the tangent function as the regression equation and one-point dose normalization is a good calibration option for the MRI-based polymer gel dosimetry.