Evaluation of Total Quality Management using MCDM Method

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

To "develop and create a sustainable climate in which employees consistently enhance their ability to offer products and services that fulfill their needs," total quality management (TQM) entails efforts on the part of the entire business. The literature claims that several components make up quality management, including crucial elements, tools, methodologies, and procedures. The objective is this thesis to define Total Quality Management (TQM) and make managers aware of its elements, facilitating the implementation of quality control. Total quality management (TQM) has recently taken up as a social movement in the US. This analysis revisits the movement's original texts to evaluate its coherence, uniqueness, and probable persistence, as well as its provocative management philosophy. We find various knowledge gaps regarding TQM processes and results and examine connections between TQM principles and behavioral science understanding of human motivation, learning, and societal change. Total Quality Management (TQM) is a method of management that focuses on long-term success through customer satisfaction. In a TQM initiative, every employee of an organization participates in improving their workplace processes, products, and services. Many businesses have concentrated on total quality management (TQM) over the past ten years as a way to increase earnings, market share, and competitiveness. An attempt is made to review the condition of the TQM literature in this essay. Literature is categorized based on the article's content and procedural difficulties. The literature uses conceptual, descriptive, empirical, cross-sectional, and longitudinal techniques as its methodologies. Weighted Total Product Assessment (WASPAS) analysis used the results to provide a must read decision makers with these Employee relations, training, quality data and reporting, Supplier quality management, Quality performance. Employee relations, training, quality data and reporting, Supplier quality management, Quality performance. Evaluation parameters of Area of manufacturing: Interrater reliability, Group 1 (internal consistency), Group 2 (internal consistency).Training has the highest rank whereas Quality performance has the lowest rank.