Abstract

AbstractIn situ sea surface temperature (SST) measurements play a critical role in the calibration/validation (Cal/Val) of satellite SST retrievals and ocean data assimilation. However, their quality is not always optimal, and proper quality control (QC) is required before they can be used with confidence. The in situ SST Quality Monitor (iQuam) system was established at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) in 2009, initially to support the Cal/Val of NOAA satellite SST products. It collects in situ SST data from multiple sources, performs uniform QC, monitors the QC’ed data online, and distributes it to users. In this study, the iQuam QC is compared with other QC methods available in some of the in situ data ingested in iQuam. Overall, the iQuam QC performs well on daily-to-monthly time scales over most global oceans and under a wide variety of environmental conditions. However, it may be less accurate in the daytime a when pronounced diurnal cycle is present, and in dynamic regions, due to the strong reliance on the “reference SST check”, which employs daily low-resolution level 4 (L4) analyses with no diurnal cycle resolved. The iQuam “performance history check”, applied to all in situ platforms, is an effective alternative to the customary “black/gray” lists, available only for some platforms (e.g., drifters and Argo floats). In the future, iQuam QC will be upgraded (e.g., using improved reference field(s), with enhanced temporal and spatial resolutions). More comparisons with external QC methods will be performed to learn and employ the best QC practices.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call