Evaluation of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and the Society for Coronary Angiography and Interventions lesion classification system in the current “stent era” of coronary interventions (from the ACC-National Cardiovascular Data Registry)

Abstract

In 1988 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) Guidelines for Coronary Angioplasty proposed a lesion classification system to stratify lesions by difficulty and risk to better understand the outcomes of coronary interventions. It was a 3-level (A, B, and C) classification based on 11 lesion characteristics. A modification, dividing the intermediate B category into B1 and B2, is also in common use. Recently, a simplification of this classification was evaluated using the large Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) Registry (SCAI I = non-C/patent; SCAI II = C/patent; SCAI III = non-C/occluded; SCAI IV = C/occluded). The lesion classification systems were evaluated in 61,926 patients from the ACC National Cardiovascular Data Registry who underwent single-vessel percutaneous coronary intervention between January 1998 and September 2000. Stents were placed in 74.5% of patients. Logistic models for lesion success and complications were constructed and compared. The c statistic for success using the ACC/AHA original classification system was 0.69, 0.71 for the modified ACC/AHA system, and 0.75 for the SCAI classification. The range of complication and success rates was greater using the SCAI models, and the logistic models for success and complication were more robust for the SCAI system. Thus, in the large ACC-National Cardiovascular Data Registry, with a high percentage of stent usage, the simpler SCAI lesion classification provided better discrimination for success and complications than the more complex ACC/AHA lesion classification system—original or modified.