Abstract
Biological microscopic analysis is a popular method employed in wastewater treatment plants worldwide for evaluating activated sludge condition. However, many operators still have reservations regarding its reliability. In this study, we evaluated and compared two methods of microscopic sludge investigation: the sludge index (SI) and the Eikelboom-van Buijsen method (EB). We investigated 79 activated sludge samples from nine treatment plants located in southern Poland over a 1-year period. For each sample, sludge volume index values were calculated and compared with the results of evaluation made on the basis of microscopic analysis. Additionally, the effluent quality was analysed in 45 of 79 cases, including investigation of suspended solids, biochemical oxygen demand, chemical oxygen demand, total nitrogen and total phosphorous. The sign test and Wilcoxon matched pairs test showed that a significant difference existed between the two investigated methods. General conclusions from both methods do not provide reliable information concerning nitrogen and phosphorus removal. The EB method had a tendency to be more conservative in its general conclusions than the SI method. Both are highly reliable for estimating activated sludge quality and solid separation properties.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
