Abstract

AbstractExtreme precipitation is one of the most severe weather hazards which have a significant influence on society, agriculture and ecosystems. The spatial extension and intensity of extreme precipitation events are two important features which need to be quantified for improved flood risk and water resource management. Here, we evaluate how well regional climate models (RCMs) reproduce precipitation extremes with respect to spatial dependency and intensity. We show by using seasonal extreme intensities in Brandenburg‐Berlin, Germany, that some RCMs underestimate the spatial dependence of extremes in summer and overestimate it in winter, compared with an observational‐based data set. Most RCMs significantly underestimate the magnitudes of extremes in summer and overestimate the magnitudes in autumn and winter. A statistical model, based on a max‐stable process, accounting for both the spatial and temporal variability is developed. We show that this model performs better in representing the spatial dependency and intensity characteristics of extreme precipitation compared to the RCMs.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call