Abstract

Conventional osteotomy techniques can, in some cases, induce higher stress on bone during implant insertion as a result of higher torque. The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the stress exerted on the underlying osseous tissues during the insertion of a tapered implant using different osteotomy techniques through a dynamic finite element analysis which has been widely applied to study biomedical problems through computer-aided software. In three different types of osteotomy techniques, namely conventional (B1), bone tap (B2), and countersink (B3), five models and implants designed per technique were prepared, implant insertion was simulated, and stress exerted by the implant during each was evaluated. Comparison of stress scores on the cortical and cancellous bone at different time points and time intervals from initiation of insertion to the final placement of the implant was made. There was a highly statistically significant difference between B1 and B2 (p = 0.0001) and B2 and B3 (p = 0.0001) groups. In contrast, there was no statistically significant difference in the stress scores between B1 and B3 (p = 0.3080) groups at all time points of implant placement. Overall, a highly significant difference was observed between the stresses exerted in each technique. Within the limitations of our study, bone tap significantly exerted lesser stresses on the entire bone than conventional and countersink type of osteotomy procedures. Considering the stress distribution at the crestal region, the countersink showed lower values in comparison to others.

Highlights

  • Dental implants represent an important advancement in oral rehabilitation

  • Stress scores between the B1-B3 groups showed no significant difference at all time points of implant placement (p = 0.3080)

  • This study set out to examine the stresses generated by various osteotomy techniques on bone

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Dental implants represent an important advancement in oral rehabilitation. They have been widely accepted as standard protocol for replacing missing teeth. The salient feature of dental implants is their biocompatibility when placed in the bone. The long-term stability of an implant is a function of both procedural (osteotomy technique, design of the implant, prosthetic materials, etc.) and patient-related factors (bone quality and/or bone volume). Control over these factors is vital for the success and stability of an implant. Compressive loads tend to maintain the implant-bone interface. Shear forces can be destructive to the bone and implant [3]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.