Evaluation of strain echocardiography and atrial electromechanical delay in patients with idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome

Abstract

Aim: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) could be an early marker for amyloidosis before developing of overt symptoms of cardiac amyloidosis (CA). CA characterized with left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction and impairment of LV deformation-based parameters. There is limited data about echocardiographic parameters such as strain value of LV, diastolic parameters and atrial EMD in patients with idiopathic CTS. In this study, we investigated LV strain values, diastolic parameters of LV and atrial EMD in patients with idiopathic CTS. Then, we compared these parameters in CTS patients to control group. Material and Method: Thirty-four patients with idiopathic CTS and twenty-four aged and sex matched volunteers were enrolled to study. Patients with known amyloidosis, heart failure, diabetes mellitus and secondary etiologic states for CTS such as trauma or rheumatologic disease were excluded from the study. ECG and echocardiographic examination of each patient were performed and recorded by cardiology specialist. Conventional and strain imaging echocardiography were performed. Atrial electromechanical delays (EMD) were measured. Results: Baseline characteristics features were not different in groups. Mitral inflow velocities (mitral E and A wave), mitral E wave deceleration time, tissue Doppler velocities (lateral annular E’ and A wave), E/A and E/E’ ratios were similar in two groups. Septal basal strain values increased in CTS group (-21.3±4.83% vs -25.7±2.96%, p<0.001). Septal apical to base ratio (SAB) and relative apical sparing (RELAPS) were increased in CTS group compared to control group (0.94±0.43 vs 0.66±0.12, 0.90±0.31 vs 0.73±0.08, p=0.004, p=0.013, respectively). PA lateral, PA septal, inter-atrial EMD and intra-atrial EMD were significantly higher in CTS group compared to control group (78.2±12.3 ms vs 70.6±9.9 ms, 64.1±8.42 ms vs 58.3±10.1 ms, 25.8±9.09 ms vs 20.7±5.31 ms, 11.68±5.11 ms vs 8.46±3.02 ms, p=0.015, p=0.023, p=0.009 and p=.008, respectively). Conclusion: In CTS group, mean basal strain decreased compared to control group. SAB and RELAPS which associate with CA, decreased in CTS group. Atrial EMD prolonged in CTS group. These changes may associate with increased risk of CA and AF in patients with CTS.