Abstract
BackgroundProduction of entomopathogenic fungi on a solid substrate, mostly on rice, is preferred by many producers due to its low technological requirements. Drying may be needed after fermentation to preserve the viability of the conidia until use. This study aimed to introduce some uncomplicated drying techniques and study their effectiveness in terms of drying time and extent, as well as their impact on the quantity of conidia produced and their biological activity. Four techniques were studied, i.e., condensing water vapor (by cooling), desiccant (using NaOH), air drying on a net, and air drying on a solid (impermeable) surface.ResultsCondensing water vapor and desiccant techniques were the fastest and most efficient, resulting in the lowest moisture content, ranging between 12 and 13%. While drying on a solid surface was the slowest and resulted in the highest moisture content of 32.98%. All of the dried samples yielded a lower quantity of conidia compared to the fresh samples. Samples of condensing water vapor, desiccant, and net techniques yielded approximately a similar quantity of conidia, ranging between 74 and 71% of the yield of the fresh sample. The solid surface sample yielded the lowest quantity of conidia, representing 63.78% of the fresh sample yield. A bioassay test on the mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae), showed that conidia dried via condensing water vapor and desiccant techniques kept their pathogenicity similar to the fresh sample, while samples dried on a net and solid surface significantly lost part of their pathogenicity.ConclusionThe condensing water vapor and desiccant techniques were the most efficient regarding the time needed, conidia yield, and pathogenicity. Drying on a solid surface was the least effective regarding the same factors.
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have