Abstract

INTRODUCTION The main goal of cochlear implantation is, without any doubt, to restore a better understanding of spoken language and thus improve the patients’ quality of life [1]. In the last years, a growing number of cochlear implant surgeons have focused on establishing minimally invasive techniques: besides atraumatic electrode insertion to spare residual hearing capabilities of the cochlea, different skin incisions were chosen with the wish for an improved aesthetic outcome and to prevent implant extrusion. Preauricular incisions were formerly performed to maximise the distance between the sutures and the implant bed, intending to reduce infections, but cannot be recommended due to the fully visible scars [2]. In retroauricular incisions, the course of the superficial temporal artery and the branches of the posterior auricular artery should be considered (Figure 1). While large incisions extending to the temporal squama were quite common in the past; nowadays many surgeons have had good experiences with rather small retroauricular incisions [3-6]. Scar outcome measures are important for patients and clinicians, since not only the long-term aesthetic impairment can be estimated, but long-term outcomes of the surgical techniques and postoperative complications like wound infections are also reflected.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.