Abstract

IntroductionRecent reports in the adult literature reported the use of standardized radiographic measurement techniques to determine distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and accuracy of (1) the MRI-based modified radioulnar ratio technique and (2) the pisoscaphoid (PiSca) and radioulnar (RaUl) distances in true lateral radiographs in children and adolescents with arthroscopically-verified TFCC tears.Materials and methodsWe retrospectively assessed lateral wrist radiographs and axial MRI sequences of 18 adolescent patients (22 wrists) who had arthroscopically-confirmed TFCC tears and compared them to similar imaging of a control group of 28 healthy patients (28 wrists). Three raters assessed the images twice in a 2-week interval. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), unifactorial ANOVA, and ROC analysis were performed with regards to the different radiographic variables.ResultsThe interrater ICCs were almost perfect for all measurements except RaUl1, which showed a substantial agreement (0.751) among the three observers. The intrarater ICCs were almost perfect when measuring PiSca and MRI, and substantial to almost perfect for RaUl. Pearson‘s correlation showed a moderate, positive correlation between PiSca and RaUl distances (r = 0.608; p < 0.001), and a moderate, negative correlation between RaUl distance and MRI shift (r = − 0.486; p = 0.010). When the three core groups (peripheral, central tear, controls) were compared to each other regarding the radiographic instability parameters, only the MRI shift revealed a statistically significant difference (p = 0.003). Comparisons revealed significant differences between patients and controls (p = 0.004) and peripheral tears vs. controls (p = 0.001 and p = 0.010). The ROC analysis revealed a significant AUC only for the MRI (AuC 0.787 and p = 0.002).ConclusionsChildren and adolescents with peripheral TFCC tears showed significantly increased instability parameters in MRI compared to controls. These measurement techniques are no replacement for a thorough clinical examination but may be helpful for indicating diagnostic wrist arthroscopy in ambiguous cases.Level of evidenceLevel III; Diagnostic.

Highlights

  • Recent reports in the adult literature reported the use of standardized radiographic measurement techniques to determine distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability

  • This retrospective case–control study aimed to assess the diagnostic validity and reliability of (1) the modified radioulnar ratio measured on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and (2) the pisoscaphoid- and radioulnar distances assessed in true lateral wrist radiographs

  • The intrarater Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were almost perfect for all three raters when measuring PiSca and MRI shift

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Recent reports in the adult literature reported the use of standardized radiographic measurement techniques to determine distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability. When the three core groups (peripheral, central tear, controls) were compared to each other regarding the radiographic instability parameters, only the MRI shift revealed a statistically significant difference (p = 0.003). Conclusions Children and adolescents with peripheral TFCC tears showed significantly increased instability parameters in MRI compared to controls. These measurement techniques are no replacement for a thorough clinical examination but may be helpful for indicating diagnostic wrist arthroscopy in ambiguous cases. TFCC tears occur more frequently after radial and/or ulnar fractures with epiphyseal lesions which potentially lead to posttraumatic radioulnar growth differences, while isolated TFCC tears are mostly caused by direct axial trauma to the forearm [4, 15]. This poses another problem after growth cessation as individuals with an ulnar variance may be more prone to TFCC wear and lesions [16]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.