Abstract

Goal. Assess potato varieties and hybrids for resistance against rhizoctonia disease and identify highly resistant varieties.
 Methods. The fundamental principle of the existing methodology for evaluating varieties is to test varieties, hybrids and species of potatoes on natural or artificial infectious backgrounds using a pure culture of the fungus Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn. The culture grown in Petri dishes was introduced when the tubers were planted in the soil. The assessment of the degree of damage to tubers and stems was carried out according to the damage to the underground organs of plants, the yield of potatoes, and then the level of variety samples was determined by resistance to the disease. Evaluation of potato varieties and hybrids for resistance against the causative agent of the disease Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn was carried out on a nine-point scale, where score 9 — no damage to stems and tubers, 7 — disease development up to 10% (high resistance); 5 — disease progression 11—25% (medium resistance); score 3 — disease progression 26—50% (low resistance).
 Results. Based on the test of potato varieties and hybrids for resistance against rhizoctonia, Dubravka, Vesta, Lugovska, Obriy, Serpanok, Yavir, Scarbnytsia, Tyras and hybrids P.207.407 (Zov × Polisska Rozheva), 205.17-24 (Adretta × 23-16s/73) and others; to medium-resistant (5 points) — Chervona Ruta, Povin, Vodogray, Horlytsia, Zov, Cupava, Nadiyna, Belarossa, Olvia, Svitanok Kyivskyi, Ukrainska Rozheva, Beregynia, Charunka, Okolytsia, Slutch, hybrids P.210.14-23 (Adretta × Posvit), 211.20-31 (Prolisok × Lugovska); to susceptible — 51, or 32.9% of the tested varieties.
 Conclusions. We have proved that mid-early ripening and early ripening cultivars as well as selection hybrids are more infected with black scab than mid-ripening, mid-late ripening and late ripening cultivars. These relatively resistant potato cultivars and hybrids are expedient to use in the selection on the resistance against black scab.

Highlights

  • Â êðà¿íàõ Çàõ3äíî¿ 3 Ñõ3äíî¿ aâðîïè ñêëåðîö3¿ çáóäíèêà Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn, çàëåæíî â3ä ñòóïåíÿ ðåçèñòåíòíîñò3 ñîðò3â äî ïàòîãåíó, ñïîñòåð3ãàþòüñÿ ó 15—30% áóëüá [3].

  • (1995) óðàæåííÿ áóëüá êàðòîïë3 ðèçîêòîí3îçîì ìào ì3ñöå íà âñ3é òåðèòîð3¿ Ðîñ3éñüêî¿ ôåäåðàö3¿, äå ê3ëüê3ñòü áóëüá 3ç ñèìïòîìàìè óðàæåííÿ çáóäíèêîì Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn ó ñïðèÿòëèâ3 ðîêè äëÿ ðîçâèòêó ïàòîãåíó ñÿãào 38% [3].

  • Ìåòà — âèçíà÷åííÿ ñò3éêîñò3 ñîðò3â òà ã3áðèä3â êàðòîïë3 ïðîòè ðèçîêòîí3îçó ÿê íà øòó÷íîìó, òàê 3 ïðèðîäíîìó 3íôåêö3éíèõ ôîíàõ â óìîâàõ Ïîë3ññÿ Óêðà¿íè, àíàë3ç òà óçàãàëüíåííÿ ðåçóëüòàò3â.

Read more

Summary

Introduction

 êðà¿íàõ Çàõ3äíî¿ 3 Ñõ3äíî¿ aâðîïè ñêëåðîö3¿ çáóäíèêà Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn, çàëåæíî â3ä ñòóïåíÿ ðåçèñòåíòíîñò3 ñîðò3â äî ïàòîãåíó, ñïîñòåð3ãàþòüñÿ ó 15—30% áóëüá [3]. (1995) óðàæåííÿ áóëüá êàðòîïë3 ðèçîêòîí3îçîì ìào ì3ñöå íà âñ3é òåðèòîð3¿ Ðîñ3éñüêî¿ ôåäåðàö3¿, äå ê3ëüê3ñòü áóëüá 3ç ñèìïòîìàìè óðàæåííÿ çáóäíèêîì Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn ó ñïðèÿòëèâ3 ðîêè äëÿ ðîçâèòêó ïàòîãåíó ñÿãào 38% [3]. Ìåòà — âèçíà÷åííÿ ñò3éêîñò3 ñîðò3â òà ã3áðèä3â êàðòîïë3 ïðîòè ðèçîêòîí3îçó ÿê íà øòó÷íîìó, òàê 3 ïðèðîäíîìó 3íôåêö3éíèõ ôîíàõ â óìîâàõ Ïîë3ññÿ Óêðà¿íè, àíàë3ç òà óçàãàëüíåííÿ ðåçóëüòàò3â.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call