Abstract

Fossil energy inputs and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with the cultivation and transport of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) for bioethanol production in Tanegashima, Japan, were estimated by life cycle assessment (LCA). The aim was to understand the effects of combined systems of polyethylene mulching treatment (mulching at planting and every ratooning, MM; mulching only at planting, MU; and untreated, i.e., no mulching at all, UU) and cultivar (a cold-tolerant genotype, NiTn18, and a conventional variety, NiF8). The mulch treatments and cultivars were combined to create six cultivation systems that were used to conduct a comparative assessment of cradle-to-gate energy inputs and emissions for bioethanol production. The LCA results showed that the energy inputs and GHG emissions resulting from the MM/NiF8 system were 6.29 MJ L−1 and 0.500 kg CO2e L−1, which were 14% and 23% lower, respectively, than the corresponding values in the UU/NiF8 system. In contrast, the MU/NiF8 system increased the environmental loads slightly. The use of NiTn18 improved sugarcane performance and ethanol yields substantially as compared with NiF8, reducing energy inputs to 5.38, 5.24, and 5.55 MJ L−1 and GHG emissions to 0.473, 0.450, and 0.441 kg CO2e L−1 for the UU, MU, and MM treatments, respectively. The energy inputs and GHG emissions were similar among the systems, indicating that more flexible mulching treatments might be acceptable in the NiTn18 systems than in the NiF8 systems. The energy inputs and GHG emissions resulting from the UU/NiTn18 system were 14% and 5% lower, respectively, than those of the MM/NiF8 system, suggesting that it may be possible to overcome the handicap of sugarcane production in cold conditions by breeding cold-tolerant cultivars.

Highlights

  • Because of increased concern about global warming and its impacts on human civilization, biofuels have attracted attention as a means to mitigate anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions causedEnergies 2020, 13, 4369; doi:10.3390/en13174369 www.mdpi.com/journal/energiesEnergies 2020, 13, 4369 by intensive fossil fuel consumption and land use [1,2]

  • Life cycle assessment (LCA) [18,19] has contributed greatly in this area, and it has been shared among researchers that sugarcane-derived bioethanol in major producing countries, mostly situated at low latitudes, has an environmental advantage in terms of fossil energy consumption and GHG emission as compared with other crop-derived biofuels such as sugar beet, maize, and wheat [20,21,22,23,24]

  • The goal of the life cycle assessment (LCA) was to estimate fossil energy consumption and GHG emissions in sugarcane cultivation systems to understand the effects of alternative treatments of mulching

Read more

Summary

Evaluation of Polyethylene Mulching and Sugarcane

Takahiro Nakashima 1, * , Keiichiro Ueno 2,† , Eisuke Fujita 2,‡ and Shoko Ishikawa 1, *. Central Region Agricultural Research Center, National Agriculture and Food Research. Present address: Kagoshima Prefectural Institute for Agricultural Development, 2200 Ono Kinpo-Cho, Minamisatsuma, Kagoshima 899-3401, Japan. Present address: Aira Isa Area Promotion Bureau, 12 Kajiki-Cho Suwamachi, Aira, Kagoshima

Introduction
Field Experiment
Treatments for Mulching
Measurement and Statistical Analysis
System Description
L of ethanol
Life Cycle Inventory
Life Cycle Impact Assessment and Sensitivity Analysis
Stalk Yield and Yield-Related Components
Energy Inputs and GHG Emissions from Fuel and Agricultural Materials
Total Energy Inputs and Total GHG Emissions to Produce 1 L of Ethanol
Section 3.4.
Sensitivity analysis of total greenhouse gas gas emissions to the direct
Comparison of Sugarcane Cultivation Systems and Other Perspectives
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call