Abstract


 
 
 
 Hybrid electric vehicle (HEV) powertrains with parallel topologies are among the frequently used layouts, because of their easy applicability on an existing conventional powertrain, by the addition of hybrid modules with mild, full, or a plug-in capability. This paper investigates three of such parallel HEV topologies: P2, P3, and P4; all in a plug-in variant, to find-out which one performs best. Apart from the topology consideration, one of the other common questions or challenges in HEV development is the ICE concept selection. To address it, the paper combines the three HEV topologies with three technologically different internal combustion engines, all with the same power outputs. Then, all the powertrain and ICE combinations are tested in homologation driving cycles and vehicle dynamics simulation test – different acceleration tests – giving a holistic methodology suitable for thorough HEV topology evaluation, identifying all possible hybridization benefits. To find the maximum CO2 potential, it is convenient to exclude the effect of the energy management control strategy on the CO2 result in a charge sustaining driving cycle; therefore, to use some optimal control method. For this task, the paper compares the Equivalent Consumption Minimization Strategy, that realizes a Pontryagin’s minimum principle against the Dynamic Programming optimal control method, which is based on Bellman’s principle of optimality. Both control methods are available as a part of GT-Suite 0D/1D/3D multi-physics CAE simulation software, that is used in our whole study.
 
 
 

Highlights

  • The current mandatory fleet-wide average emission target in EU – set to 95 grams of CO2/km starting with 2020 "phase-in" period and following full application from 2021 [1] – pushes the automotive industry into the realm of powertrain electrification

  • The hybrid electric vehicles (HEV) and electric vehicles (EV) results are strongly influenced by the gear ratios available for the electric motor (EM): the P2 topology can shift gears, whereas the P3, and P4 can only make use of single gear, which is more beneficial for P4

  • Our paper presents a full development and benchmarking methodology for HEV powertrains, that is built on GT-Suite simulation software platform

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The current mandatory fleet-wide average emission target in EU – set to 95 grams of CO2/km starting with 2020 "phase-in" period and following full application from 2021 [1] – pushes the automotive industry into the realm of powertrain electrification. There are many technical challenges that need to be addressed in the early development stages of any new HEV powertrain These revolve mainly around the overall CO2 emission reduction potential, of the chosen parallel topology, different internal combustion engine (ICE) technology, or battery size, and – when talking about the PHEV solutions – the performance gains in dynamic tasks. DP algorithm solves the highly nonlinear HEV system’s behavior, in a globally optimal manner It is a numerical control method of solving a multi-stage decision-making optimal control problem ([2] or [3]), based on the Bellman’s principle of optimality, requiring a priori information about the entire optimization horizon (in our case the entire driving cycle).

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call