Evaluation of phytoremediation potential of five Cd (hyper)accumulators in two Cd contaminated soils

Abstract

A phytoextraction experiment with five Cd hyperaccumulators (Amaranthus hypochondriacus, Celosia argentea, Solanum nigrum, Phytolacca acinosa and Sedum plumbizincicola) was conducted in two soils with different soil pH (5.93 and 7.43, respectively). Most accumulator plants grew better in the acidic soil, with 19.59–39.63% higher biomass than in the alkaline soil, except for S. plumbizincicola. The potential for a metal-contaminated soil to be cleaned up using phytoremediation is determined by the metal uptake capacity of hyperaccumulator, soil properties, and mutual fitness of plant-soil relationships. In the acidic soil, C. argentea and A. hypochondriacus extracted the highest amount of Cd (1.03 mg pot−1 and 0.92 mg pot−1, respectively). In the alkaline soil, S. plumbizincicola performed best, mainly as a result of high Cd accumulation in plant tissue (541.36 mg kg−1). Most plants achieved leaf Cd bioconcentration factor (BCF) of >10 in the acidic soil, compared to <4 in the alkaline soil. Soil Cd availability was chiefly responsible for such contrasting metal extraction capacity, with 5.02% fraction and 48.50% fraction of total Cd being available in the alkaline and acidic soil, respectively. In the alkaline soil, plants tended to increase rhizosphere soil available Cd mainly through excreting more low molecular weight organic acids, not through changing the soil pH. In the acidic soil, plants slightly decreased soil available Cd. Those species which have high Ca, Zn, Fe uptake capacity extract more Cd from soil, and a positive correlation was found between the concentrations of Cd and Ca, Zn, Fe in leaves. Soil available Ca2+, Mg2+, SO42−, Cl− did not play a key role in Cd uptake by plants. In summary, acidic soil was of higher potential to recover from Cd contamination by phytoextraction, while in the alkaline soil, S. plumbizincicola showed potential for Cd phytoextraction.