EVALUATION OF MONOSTAPH PLUS IN COMPARISON TO TWO OTHER LATEX AGGLUTINATION TESTS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS

Abstract

ABSTRACT Three latex agglutination kits for rapid identification of Staphylococcus aureus were compared by testing a selection of isolates, which included methicillin resistant S. aureus, methicillin sensitive S. aureus and a diverse selection of coagulase‐negative staphylococci. The sensitivities of Monostaph Plus (Bionor Laboratories, Skien, Norway), Pastorex Plus (Bio‐Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) and Staphaurex Plus (Oxoid, Cambridge, UK) were 98.5, 98.3 and 98.3% respectively, and the specificities were 97.5, 97.0 and 96.5%, respectively. None of the kits detected Staphylococcus lugdunensis correctly. This evaluation shows that the Monostaph Plus agglutination kit performs well and comparable to Pastorex Staph‐Plus and Staphaurex Plus.PRACTICAL APPLICATIONSLatex agglutination kits are very useful in the routine identification of Staphylococcus aureus, but can occasionally give false‐positive or false‐negative results. Knowledge of how the various available kits are performing is, therefore, very important when selecting a kit for use. Correct identification of S. aureus is important, especially in relation to methicillin‐resistant S. aureus, since other staphylococci species are known to carry the methicillin‐resistance determinant mecA, but are of less clinical importance. This study is the first study comparing an improved version of the Monstaph‐Plus kit with other latex agglutination kits, and provides new data about this kit.