Abstract

The high-potential of lightweight components consisting of similar or dissimilar materials can be exploited by Solid-State Joining techniques. Whereas defects such as pores and hot cracking are often an issue in fusion-based joining processes, via solid-state joining processes they can be avoided to enable high-quality welds. To define an optimal process window for obtaining anticipated joint properties, numerous time and cost consuming experiments are usually required. Building a predictive model based on regression analysis enables the identification and quantification of process-property relationships. On the one hand, mechanical property and performance predictions based on specific process parameters are needed, on the other hand, inverse determination of required process parameters for reaching desired properties or performances are demanded. If these relations are obtained, optimized process parameter sets can be identified while vast numbers of required experiments can be reduced, as underlying physical mechanisms are utilized. In this study, different regression analysis algorithms, such as linear regression, decision trees and random forests, are applied to the refill Friction Stir Spot Welding process for establishing correlations between process parameters and joint properties. Experimental data sets used for training and testing are based on a Box-Behnken Design of Experiments (DoE) and additional test experiments, respectively. The machine-learning based regression analyses are benchmarked against linear regression and DoE statistics. The results illustrate a decryption of relationships along the process-property chain and its deployment to predict mechanical properties governed by process parameters.

Highlights

  • Vast improvements of light-weight structures to reach weight-savings in transportation industries originate from the ubiquitous scientific, economical and societal demand to reduce the fossil-fuel consumption and cost as well as to decrease the emission of green-house gases [1]

  • decision tree regression (DTR) can be considered as the best prediction model, since an R2 value of 99.7 % is reached on the training set, while a similar R2 value of 98.7 % is reached on the test set; the lack-of-fit amounts to 0.3% on the training set and to 1.3 % on the test set

  • Due to the iterative nature of recurring training on the residuals of the combined learners, boosted forests are able to learn non-linear relationships, which seem to be contained in the data because predictions by linear regressions exhibit relatively low determination coefficients, respectively, which indicates less good prediction performance

Read more

Summary

Objectives

The aim of this study is to expand this perspective via the deployment of non-linear prediction models

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.