Abstract
The realization of a hydrogen transport network requires the requalification of existing high‐pressure natural gas pipelines and the design and construction of new hydrogen pipelines. Therefore, appropriate design codes are needed, which consider the detrimental effects of gaseous hydrogen on the mechanical properties and ensure a robust, but not too conservative, lifetime concept. For the assessment of hydrogen pipelines, the ASME B31.12 is understood as a benchmark standard. Recently, the technical rule DVGW G 464 (2023) was published in Germany. Both standards consider a fracture mechanics‐based concept, where the pipeline design lifetime is assessed by the hydrogen‐assisted fatigue crack growth of a pre‐existing defect until a defined lifetime criterion is reached. This article compares both concepts within a use case study, where influencing factors on the lifetime predictions are identified and discussed. Relatively similar results are obtained for typical loading scenarios, whereby the ASME B31.12 predicts more allowable cycles compared to the DVGW G 464 mostly arising from a different assumed crack length. To reduce the conservatism, the focus in the design and assessment of hydrogen pipelines should be placed on a detectable small initial crack size and the measurement of material‐specific crack growth curves resulting in pronounced lifetime enhancements.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.