Abstract

Habitat suitability index (HSI) models are commonly used to predict habitat quality and species distributions and are used to develop biological surveys, assess reserve and management priorities, and anticipate possible change under different management or climate change scenarios. Important management decisions may be based on model results, often without a clear understanding of the level of uncertainty associated with model outputs. We present an integrated methodology to assess the propagation of uncertainty from both inputs and structure of the HSI models on model outputs (uncertainty analysis: UA) and relative importance of uncertain model inputs and their interactions on the model output uncertainty (global sensitivity analysis: GSA). We illustrate the GSA/UA framework using simulated hydrology input data from a hydrodynamic model representing sea level changes and HSI models for two species of submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) in southwest Everglades National Park: Vallisneria americana (tape grass) and Halodule wrightii (shoal grass). We found considerable spatial variation in uncertainty for both species, but distributions of HSI scores still allowed discrimination of sites with good versus poor conditions. Ranking of input parameter sensitivities also varied spatially for both species, with high habitat quality sites showing higher sensitivity to different parameters than low-quality sites. HSI models may be especially useful when species distribution data are unavailable, providing means of exploiting widely available environmental datasets to model past, current, and future habitat conditions. The GSA/UA approach provides a general method for better understanding HSI model dynamics, the spatial and temporal variation in uncertainties, and the parameters that contribute most to model uncertainty. Including an uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in modeling efforts as part of the decision-making framework will result in better-informed, more robust decisions.

Highlights

  • Modeling or predicting habitat suitability and species’ distributions is fundamental to research in ecology and conservation

  • Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd

  • We found a predominance of approximately normally distributed Probability distribution functions (PDFs) at our benchmark sites, suggesting that the mapped uncertainties can be interpreted as standard deviation (SD) or confidence levels on the outputs (Morgan and Henrion 1992)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Modeling or predicting habitat suitability and species’ distributions is fundamental to research in ecology and conservation. For species for which the presence–absence or abundance data are available, a wide variety of species distribution models (SDM) can be used to find statistical relationships between empirical data on species distribution and environmental data (Elith and Leathwick 2009). In the absence of distribution data, processbased or mechanistic models are available to model habitat suitability and potential distribution (Dormann et al 2012). One such process-based approach that has been widely used is “habitat suitability index” (HSI) models.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call