Abstract
Accurate spatial and temporal representation of precipitation is of utmost importance for hydrological applications. Uncertainties in available data sets increase with spatial resolution due to small-scale processes over complex terrain. As previous studies revealed high regional differences in the performance of gridded precipitation data sets, it is important to assess the related uncertainties at the catchment scale, where these data sets are typically applied, e.g., for hydrological modeling. In this study, the uncertainty of eight gridded precipitation data sets from various sources is investigated over an alpine catchment. A high resolution reference data set is constructed from station data and applied to quantify the contribution of spatial resolution to the overall uncertainty. While the results demonstrate that the data sets reasonably capture inter-annual variability, they show large seasonal differences. These increase for daily indicators assessing dry and wet spells as well as heavy precipitation. Although the higher resolution data sets, independent of their source, show a better agreement, the coarser data sets showed great potential especially in the representation of the overall climatology. To bridge the gaps in data scarce areas and to overcome the issues with observational data sets (e.g., undercatch and station density) it is important to include a variety of data sets and select an ensemble for a robust representation of catchment precipitation. However, the study highlights the importance of a thorough assessment and a careful selection of the data sets, which should be tailored to the desired application.
Highlights
Precipitation plays an important role in the hydrological cycle and is one of the most widely used climate variables [1,2]
The uncertainties and within differences within the or bias correct the uncertainties and differences the ensemble of ensemble of available daily, gridded precipitation data products have to be evaluated on the catchment scale
It has to be pointed out that findings over this area do not allow for a performance assessment of the presented data sets in general
Summary
Precipitation plays an important role in the hydrological cycle and is one of the most widely used climate variables [1,2]. Accurate assessment of precipitation is of utmost importance as it provides the meteorological input for hydrological and other impact models and studies. As precipitation varies greatly in space and time [7,8], gridded precipitation information in high temporal and spatial resolution is required. The need for such high-resolution data sets is crucial and limited to hydrological applications, but many other fields, such as evaluation of the performance of climate simulations and possible detection and adjustment of model biases. The need for high resolution is increased over areas with complex topography with high spatial variability [9]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.