Abstract
Objective: In this study, it was aimed to determine whether the flora bacteria growing in blood cultures were infectious agents or only contaminants, for this purpose the hemogram parameters and other demographic characteristics of the patients were evaluated.
 Materials and Methods: We evaluated 11.579 blood culture results using the BacT/ALERT® microbial detection system. The skin flora bacteria was detected in the blood cultures during one year and the rates of infectious agents among these bacteria were investigated retrospectively. The blood culture results, which were accepted as true bacteremia and contamination were compared in terms of positive blood culture flask count and inflammation markers (white blood cell count, neutrophil ratio, lymphocyte ratio and C-reactive protein levels).
 Results: The total number of blood culture test was 11.579. Out of this number, 8205 (70.87%) was free of microbial growth and there was 3374 (29.13%) with microbial growth. 2609 (77.3%) of the positive cultures represented skin flora bacteria, 2510 (96.2%) of them were coagulase negative staphylococci. Only 50 (1.9%) of the flora bacteria were considered as infectious agents in terms of clinical and laboratory findings in addition to culture. A statistically significant correlation was found between true bacteremia and white blood cell (WBC) count and C-reactive protein (C-RP) levels (p <0.05).
 Conclusion: Peripheral blood collection instead of catheter and using special phlebotomy teams should be taken into consideration in order to reduce contamination rates precautions such as adequate skin preparation, preparation of blood culture bottles and using single needle instead of double needle.
 Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science Vol.20(2) 2021 p.288-292
Highlights
The blood culture is still considered as “gold standard’’ for the diagnosis of bacteremia
Demographic characters of the patients were not found significant in terms of true bacteremia or contamination (Table 1)
The total number of tests accepted for blood culture was 11.579; 8205 (70.87%) of which were free of microbial growth whereas 3374 (29.13%) yielded microbial growth
Summary
The blood culture is still considered as “gold standard’’ for the diagnosis of bacteremia. The detection of growth in the blood culture does not always indicate the presence of an infection. Positive blood culture results must be determined whether the organism represents a clinically significant infection or a false positive result of no clinical consequence. 1. Filiz Orak, Assistant Professor, Kahramanmaraş Sutcu Imam University, Department of Microbiology, Kahramanmaras, 46100, Turkey. 2. Hulusi Guven, Necip Fazil Kisakürek City Hospital, Kahramanmaras, Turkey 3.
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have