Abstract

Assessment and evaluation of outcomes and continuous quality improvement often lead to uneasiness among engineering educators, which is a barrier to implementing an effective system of results-assessment. The sophisticated evaluation models and analytical instruments adopted by higher learning institutions are believed to worsen this uneasiness, impeding the successful implementation of programme quality improvement. In this paper, the challenges in assessing and evaluating learning outcomes, types of programme outcome assessment model and an analytical tool known as Engineering Outcome Analytics developed by Tunku Abdul Rahman University College for the assessment were presented. Documents related to quality improvement from two higher learning institutions in Malaysia were reviewed and discussed based on the key elements of continuous quality improvement. The results can be used to avoid the shortcomings and adopt the best practices in continuous quality improvement. With proper understanding on the key elements of continuous quality improvement, and adoption of culminating assessment model and a highly integrated analytical tool, engineering educators and programme owners are expected to benefit from this re-search in three ways. First, it cultivates a culture of continuous improvement of quality by increasing the educators' willingness to evaluate results. Second, it enhances their existing analytical tools to reflect students' actual developments, resulting in significant continuous actions to improve quality. Third, it satisfies the accreditation requirements on outcomes-based assessment.

Highlights

  • Programme Outcomes (POs) are probably the most critical criterion for Outcomesbased Education (OBE) that emphasises on improving the intellectual skills and capabilities of graduates [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]

  • The Engineering Accreditation Council Malaysia (EAC) Programme Accreditation Standards [6] has included the assessment and evaluation of POs in the Engineering Curriculum to ensure that Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) is carried out on a regular basis

  • The first requirement has strong relationship to constructivist philosophy which aligns curriculum, pedagogy and assessment [10], the second requirement on CQI is directly resulted from the first requirement on constructive alignment, and the final requirement is related to the existent of a faculty culture that supports the outcomes-based assessment system

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Programme Outcomes (POs) are probably the most critical criterion for Outcomesbased Education (OBE) that emphasises on improving the intellectual skills and capabilities of graduates [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]. The Engineering Accreditation Council Malaysia (EAC) Programme Accreditation Standards [6] has included the assessment and evaluation of POs in the Engineering Curriculum to ensure that Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) is carried out on a regular basis. The curriculum, teaching-learning activities, and assessment tools shall support the attainment of the POs. Secondly, attainment of the POs must be adequately assessed and used for improvements at the course and programme levels and the engineering programmes must show a high degree of stakeholders' involvement in the mentioned processes. The first requirement has strong relationship to constructivist philosophy which aligns curriculum, pedagogy and assessment [10], the second requirement on CQI is directly resulted from the first requirement on constructive alignment, and the final requirement is related to the existent of a faculty culture that supports the outcomes-based assessment system

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.