Abstract

There is increasing interest in the application of digital soil mapping (DSM) projections to infer changes in soil carbon across both space and time. This approach relies on the assumption that the spatially modeled soil carbon-environment relationship can be transferred over time. However, this assumption is rarely tested due to a lack of temporally independent validation data. This paper assesses this assumption by developing models of topsoil organic carbon stocks (SOCS) with a deep learning algorithm and data covering mainland China pertaining to the 1980s and 2010s. The temporal prediction performance of models capturing a specific period was assessed by evaluating their performance in the prediction of data during another period. The results revealed that the prediction accuracy of temporal modeling decreased, as indicated by the coefficient of determination, and was lower than that of spatial modeling. The lower prediction accuracy obtained with the DSM-projection approach may result from differences in the magnitudes of influential variables across periods. We found that different levels of environmental similarity and model projection sensitivity to dynamic variables may cause discrepancies in forecast and hindcast accuracy. Our results demonstrate that the prediction error in temporal modeling is related to the degree of environmental similarity between periods. Our findings generally support the implementation of the DSM-projection approach in soil carbon change modeling. However, caution should be exercised, as there exists much uncertainty regarding the projection of spatial models over time.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call