Abstract

BackgroundWe aimed to evaluate the clinical robustness of a commercially developed data-driven respiratory gating algorithm based on principal component analysis, for use in routine PET imaging.MethodsOne hundred fifty-seven adult FDG PET examinations comprising a total of 1149 acquired bed positions were used for the assessment. These data are representative of FDG scans currently performed at our institution. Data were acquired for 4 min/bed position (3 min/bed for legs). The data-driven gating (DDG) algorithm was applied to each bed position, including those where minimal respiratory motion was expected. The algorithm provided a signal-to-noise measure of respiratory-like frequencies within the data, denoted as R. Qualitative evaluation was performed by visual examination of the waveforms, with each waveform scored on a 3-point scale by two readers and then averaged (score S of 0 = no respiratory signal, 1 = some respiratory-like signal but indeterminate, 2 = acceptable signal considered to be respiratory). Images were reconstructed using quiescent period gating and compared with non-gated images reconstructed with a matched number of coincidences. If present, the SUVmax of a well-defined lesion in the thorax or abdomen was measured and compared between the two reconstructions.ResultsThere was a strong (r = 0.86) and significant correlation between R and scores S. Eighty-six percent of waveforms with R ≥ 15 were scored as acceptable for respiratory gating. On average, there were 1.2 bed positions per patient examination with R ≥ 15. Waveforms with high R and S were found to originate from bed positions corresponding to the thorax and abdomen: 90% of waveforms with R ≥ 15 had bed centres in the range 5.6 cm superior to 27 cm inferior from the dome of the liver. For regions where respiratory motion was expected to be minimal, R tended to be < 6 and S tended to be 0. The use of DDG significantly increased the SUVmax of focal lesions, by an average of 11% when considering lesions in bed positions with R ≥ 15.ConclusionsThe majority of waveforms with high R corresponded to the part of the patient where respiratory motion was expected. The waveforms were deemed suitable for respiratory gating when assessed visually, and when used were found to increase SUVmax in focal lesions.

Highlights

  • We aimed to evaluate the clinical robustness of a commercially developed data-driven respiratory gating algorithm based on principal component analysis, for use in routine PET imaging

  • Commercial products that interface with the PET-CT scanner include the respiratory gating system AZ-733VI (Anzai Medical; Tokyo, Japan) and the Real-time Position ManagementTM (RPM) Respiratory Gating system (Varian Medical Systems; CA, USA)

  • We evaluated respiratory waveforms generated by a data-driven gating (DDG) algorithm which has been commercially developed by GE Healthcare (Waukesha, WI, USA), marketed with the name MotionFree, and which has the 510(k) approval for use in the USA

Read more

Summary

Introduction

We aimed to evaluate the clinical robustness of a commercially developed data-driven respiratory gating algorithm based on principal component analysis, for use in routine PET imaging. Commercial products that interface with the PET-CT scanner include the respiratory gating system AZ-733VI (Anzai Medical; Tokyo, Japan) and the Real-time Position ManagementTM (RPM) Respiratory Gating system (Varian Medical Systems; CA, USA) While these external systems do provide respiratory gating solutions, they require time to set up on the patient and occasionally do not yield a useful gating waveform [6]. The periodic motion of the radioactivity within the patient, attributable to respiration, can be extracted from either the PET raw data (e.g. from a time series of short-duration sinograms [7]) or from PET images (e.g. from a time series of short-duration PET images [8]) In both cases, the duration must be a small fraction of the respiratory period, e.g. 0.5 s. Commercial data-driven respiratory gating solutions have not been widely available

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call