Evaluation of continued 2-monthly or annual urate monitoring in gout: an extension of the GoutSMART randomised controlled feasibility trial

Abstract

Aim: Improved outcomes for patients with gout are associated with reduced urate levels and many guidelines recommend regular urate monitoring. There is no consensus on how frequently monitoring should be performed, and so we have used a supported self-management approach which incorporates urate self-testing to evaluate 2-monthly urate monitoring compared to annual monitoring. Methods: This study was an extension of a 12-month feasibility trial in 60 gout patients randomised 2:1 to support gout self-management or usual care. Participants exiting the self-management arm were offered 2-monthly urate monitoring, with usual care participants offered annual monitoring. Additional participants were randomised 1:1 to either arm. All participants were offered initial dose titration to a urate target of 0.3 mmol/L. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants with urate ≤ 0.36 mmol/L at 24 months with an intention-to-treat analysis. Results: Between September 2020, and September 2021, 67 patients were enrolled. The mean age was 55.5 (SD 14.0) years. 61 (91%) self-reported as cisgender male, 5 (7.5%) as cisgender female and 1 (1.5%) as transgender female. 62 (92.5%) were White, 4 (6.0%) were Asian and 1 (1.5%) was Black. 40 participants were allocated to 2-monthly monitoring (including 10 new participants), and 27 participants to annual monitoring (including 12 new participants). The primary study outcome of urate ≤ 0.36 mmol/L at 24 months was achieved by 38 (95%) 2-monthly monitoring participants, compared to 17 (62.9%) annual monitoring participants (risk difference 0.32 [95% CI 0.13 to 0.52]; p = 0.0021). 5 (7.5%) participants withdrew with 4 allocated to annual monitoring. 2 annual monitoring participants died. Conclusions: 2-monthly monitoring of urate is associated with improved maintenance of urate targets after 2 years compared to annual monitoring, a result influenced by an increased withdrawal rate amongst annual monitoring participants. Further trials evaluating the cost-effectiveness and optimal frequency of urate monitoring are now needed (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03274063).