Evaluation of conservation tillage practices in the production of organic flue‐cured tobacco

Abstract

AbstractIntensive tillage in flue‐cured tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) contributes to soil erosion and reduced water‐holding capacity of soils. Conservation tillage minimizes soil disturbance by planting a crop directly into the residue of overwintered cover crop. Reducing tillage has been shown to improve soil health (increased rainwater infiltration, improved water‐holding capacity, reduced erosion) and to reduce production costs (fuel and labor). The objective of this study was to compare the effects of conservation and conventional tillage on weed management in organically grown flue‐cured tobacco. Field studies were conducted in Kinston, NC, in 2019 and 2020 and in Rocky Mount, NC, in 2020, comparing the impacts of conventional tillage and conservation tillage on weed emergence and tobacco production. An overwintered cereal rye (Secale cereal L.) cover crop was conventionally tilled or terminated via roller‐crimper and left in place as a mulch prior to transplant of flue‐cured tobacco. Cover crop biomass, weed emergence and biomass, soil resistance, crop yield and quality, and cured leaf chemistry were evaluated. In all environments, conservation tillage with cover crop residue reduced weed density and biomass when compared with conventional tillage treatments. In 2019, cured leaf yield was higher under conservation tillage practices than under conventional tillage. In 2020, environmental conditions in both locations resulted in crop loss. These results indicate that conservation tillage practices may be an effective weed management strategy while improving yields in an organic production system. However, organic flue‐cured tobacco grown under conservation tillage is vulnerable to extreme rain events due to the exclusion of in‐season cultivation.