Abstract
Introduction: The prevalent location and incidence of intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct (IPNB) and invasive carcinoma associated with them have varied markedly among studies due to differences in diagnostic criteria and tumor location. To clarify the clinicopathological features of IPNB, a collaborative study of IPNB based on the new classification was performed by the Japan Biliary Association and the Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery. Methods: IPNBs were classified into two types: Type 1 IPNB, being histologically similar to intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas, and Type 2 IPNB, having a more complex histological architecture with irregular papillary branching or foci of solid-tubular components. Medical data, pathological findings and long-term outcomes for the two types were evaluated. Results: Among 694 IPNB patients, 520 and 174 had Type 1 and Type 2, respectively. The levels of AST, ALT, ALP, γ-GTP, T. Bil, CEA and CA19-9 were significantly higher in patients with Type 2 than in those with Type 1. Type 1 IPNB was more frequently located in the intrahepatic bile duct than Type 2, whereas Type 2 was more frequently located in the distal bile duct than Type 1 IPNB (P< 0.001). There were significant differences in 5-year cumulative survival rates (75.2% vs 50.9%; P < 0.0001) and 5-year cumulative disease-free survival rates (64.1% vs 35.3%; P < 0.0001) between the two groups. Conclusion: Type 1 and Type 2 IPNBs differ in their clinicopathological features and prognosis. IPNB should not be discussed as a single-entity disease but as heterogeneous disease.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.