Evaluating the significance of next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing in Indian patients with advanced malignancies: An observational study on clinical outcomes and treatment costs.

Abstract

e15091 Background: The widespread use of Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) panels to guide targeted therapy in advanced malignancies has raised questions regarding their real-world impact on clinical outcomes and affordability. Methods: This observational study included 126 patients, conducted between January 2022 and December 2023 aimed to assess the utility of NGS testing in both the initial and subsequent lines of treatment for Indian patients facing advanced malignancies. Results: In the first-line setting, NGS was extensively employed for patients with metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) and Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Analysis of RAS and BRAF mutations in mCRC patients (n=21) informed the choice between EGFR and VEGFR-directed therapy, resulting in a median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) of 7.5 months. In NSCLC patients (n=37), the NGS identified targetable mutations in 30 cases, leading to significantly improved mPFS (12 months vs 6 mo with chemotherapy alone). NGS was also employed for HRR, HRD and BRCA testing in advanced breast (n=45) and ovarian carcinoma (n=11), which helps in determining prognosis, role of targeted therapy and genetics. No adverse events noted till date. For patients undergoing subsequent lines of treatment (n=12), NGS detected targetable mutations in 9 cases. NGS revealed actionable mutations (ERBB2, CD74/NRG1fusion and KRAS12C mutation) in metastatic NSCLC patients (n=3), leading to appropriate treatment and PFS of 4-6 months. In metastatic NSCLC patients, T790M mutation was detected in 1 patient confering PFS of 6 months with change to Osimertinib and EGFR exon 20 insertion mutation detected in another, survival didn't improve with addition of amivantamab due to poor general condition. Alpelisib was started for PIK3CA mutation in metastatic Ca Breast (HR+,HEr2-), which was discontinued due to poor tolerance after 3 months. In Metastatic Neuroendocrine Carcinoma (NEC) Lung, detection of EGFR l858R mutation did not confer a PFS benefit despite the addition of Geftinib to chemotherapy. Due to financial constraints, targeted therapy couldn't be started for 2 patients with pathogenic target detected. Conclusions: The study's findings suggest that NGS testing offers tangible clinical benefits in both initial and subsequent lines of treatment for advanced malignancies in the Indian population. Despite the varying costs of NGS in India (ranging from 240 to 1800 USD), the data implies an overall affordability, making it a viable option for patients with advanced malignancies. However, NGS didn't improve outcomes in patients with rapidly progressing disease, poor general condition and financial constraints.