Abstract

The Resource Recovery Planning Model (RRPLAN) is used to illustrate an approach for evaluating the risks associated with alternative solid waste management programs. The paper first discusses how RRPLAN uses a detailed cost accounting framework to weigh the consequences of decisions affecting siting, routing, marketing and financing. A case study of the tri-county area surrounding Jackson, Mississippi, where two waste-to-energy facilities are compared to an all-landfill option, is then introduced. The case study shows how the results of a sensitivity analysis can be used to develop a cost estimating relationship between the discounted cost per Mg (ton) of processing at a waste-to-energy facility and three explanatory variables: (1) the capital cost of the facility; (2) the volume of waste processed; and (3) revenues from the sale of recoverable materials and any associated tipping fees. A Monte Carlo experiment is then performed to show how variations about the expected values for the three explanatory variables affect the risk of the program. The probability that the discounted cost per Mg of the waste-to-energy facility exceeds that of the all-landfill option is used as a risk assessment mechanism.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.