Abstract
Deformable image registration (DIR) is widely used nowadays to register images acquired throughout the radiation oncology treatment course for target delineation, dose accumulation, and adaptive planning. However, the accuracy of commercial DIR software remains questionable and there lacks a “ground truth” to benchmark DIR software for real patient images. We introduced a new method based on anthropomorphic modeling to provide accurate DIR for head and neck patients and evaluated the accuracy of commercial DIR software. Four head and neck patients from the Cancer Imaging Archive, Collection Head-Neck Cetuximab were selected to demonstrate the concept. Each patient had two PETCTs and a planning CT taken with the patient at different positions. Two patients had arms up in PETCT and down in planning CT. The bony structures in each CT were automatically segmented into individual bone groups (e.g. each vertebra) using image processing, clustering, and pattern matching. Model-based DIR rigidly registers each bone group using Iterative Closest Point algorithm then deforms soft tissue with the bones using finite element method. Model-based DIR can be considered as the “truth” of DIR at the bones. The accuracy of rigid registrations and four commercial DIR software were evaluated. The mean absolute errors of DIR for multiple rigid registration (the best of three rigid registrations aligning to base of skull, mid-neck, and lower neck/shoulder respectively), DIR software A (constrained, intensity based, free-form algorithm), B (hybrid algorithm designed for head and neck), C (multi-resolution B-Spline algorithm) and D (hybrid algorithm using image intensity and region of interest constraints) were listed in Table 1.Abstract TU_38_3272; Table 1Mean absolute errors of multiple rigid registration and four DIR software for head and neck patient imagesMean absolute error (cm)HeadJawSpineClavicleScapulaeHumerus (Arms up/down)Humerus (Arm down)SternumRibsMultiple rigid registrations0.260.510.721.892.147.922.430.610.77Software A0.570.250.611.591.506.551.580.350.65Software B0.640.300.631.161.376.830.920.300.78Software C0.430.350.851.471.515.221.170.561.07Software D0.660.320.741.311.885.841.680.450.85 Open table in a new tab Anthropomorphic modeling provides the truth of DIR for bones in head and neck patient images which can be used to measure the accuracy of commercial DIR software. For the patients studied, the mean DIR errors were on the order of millimeters except for large posture change (arms up/down). The performance of DIR software was comparable with each other and with multiple rigid registrations despite the difference in the algorithm used. There is not an algorithm that outperforms others in all regions.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.