Abstract
Wetland coverage and type distributions vary systematically by ecoregion across the Great Lakes Basin. Land use and subsequent changes in wetland type distributions also vary among ecoregions. Incidence of wetland disturbance varies significantly within ecoregions but tends to increase from north to south with intensity of land use. Although the nature of disturbance activities varies by predominant land-use type, mechanisms of impact and potential response endpoints appear to be similar across agricultural and urban areas. Based on the proportion of associated disturbance activities and proportion response endpoints affected, the highest ranking mechanisms of impact are sedimentation/turbidity, retention time, eutrophication, and changes in hydrologic timing. Disturbance activities here are defined as events that cause wetland structure or function to vary outside of a normal range, while stressors represent the individual internal or external agents (causes) that act singly or in combination to impair one or more wetland functions. Responses most likely associated with disturbance activities based on shared mechanisms of impact are 1) shifts in plant species composition, 2) reduction in wildlife production, 3) decreased local or regional biodiversity, 4) reduction in fish and/or other secondary production, 5) increased flood peaks/frequency, 6) increased above-ground production, 7) decreased water quality downstream, and 8) loss of aquatic plant species with high light compensation points. General strategies and goals for wetland restoration can be derived at the ecoregion scale using information on current and historic wetlands extent and type distributions and the distribution of special-concern species dependent on specific wetland types or mosaics of habitat types. Restoration of flood-control and water-quality improvement functions will require estimates of wetland coverage relative to total land area or specific land uses (e.g., deforestation, urbanization) at the watershed scale. The high incidence of disturbance activities in the more developed southern ecoregions of both Canada and the U.S. is reflected in the loss of species across all wetland types. The species data here suggest that an effective regional strategy must include restoration of a diversity of wetland types, including the rarer wetland types (wet meadows, fens), as well as forested swamps, which were extensive historically. The prevalence of anthropogenic stresses and openwater habitats likely contributes to the concentration of exotic species in inland wetlands of the southern Great Lakes ecoregions. Vegetation removal and site disturbance are the best-documented causes for plant invasions, and encroachment activities are common in marshes and ponds of the southern ecoregions.
Full Text
Topics from this Paper
Wetland Types
Wetland Function
Great Lakes Basin
Loss Of Species
Specific Wetland Types
+ Show 5 more
Create a personalized feed of these topics
Get StartedTalk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
Ying yong sheng tai xue bao = The journal of applied ecology
Nov 1, 2023
Revista Chilena de Historia Natural
Nov 8, 2014
Journal of environmental management
Dec 1, 2023
Freshwater Biology
Oct 7, 2009
Journal of Environmental Management
Feb 1, 2019
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Dec 19, 2008
Wetlands
Aug 25, 2013
The Science of the total environment
Nov 1, 2023
Land
May 8, 2021
Ecological Applications
Feb 1, 1996
Wetlands
Sep 1, 2001
Frontiers in Environmental Science
Mar 9, 2022
Wetlands
Wetlands
Nov 24, 2023
Wetlands
Nov 22, 2023
Wetlands
Nov 14, 2023
Wetlands
Nov 7, 2023
Wetlands
Oct 23, 2023
Wetlands
Oct 19, 2023
Wetlands
Oct 16, 2023
Wetlands
Oct 1, 2023
Wetlands
Oct 1, 2023
Wetlands
Oct 1, 2023