Evaluating CHASER V4.0 global formaldehyde (HCHO) simulations using satellite, aircraft, and ground-based remote-sensing observations

Abstract

Abstract. Formaldehyde (HCHO), a precursor to tropospheric ozone, is an important tracer of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the atmosphere. Two years (2019–2020) of HCHO simulations obtained from the global chemistry transport model CHASER at a horizontal resolution of 2.8° × 2.8° have been evaluated using the Tropospheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) and multi-axis differential optical absorption spectroscopy (MAX-DOAS) observations. In situ measurements from the Atmospheric Tomography Mission (ATom) in 2018 were used to evaluate the HCHO simulations for 2018. CHASER reproduced the TROPOMI-observed global HCHO spatial distribution with a spatial correlation (r) of 0.93 and a negative bias of 7 %. The model showed a good capability to reproduce the observed magnitude of the HCHO seasonality in different regions, including the background conditions. The discrepancies between the model and satellite in the Asian regions were related mainly to the underestimated and missing anthropogenic emission inventories. The maximum difference between two HCHO simulations based on two different nitrogen oxide (NOx) emission inventories was 20 %. TROPOMI's finer spatial resolution than that of the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) sensor reduced the global model–satellite root-mean-square error (RMSE) by 20 %. The OMI- and TROPOMI-observed seasonal variations in HCHO abundances were consistent. The simulated seasonality showed better agreement with TROPOMI in most regions. The simulated HCHO and isoprene profiles correlated strongly (R=0.81) with the ATom observations. However, CHASER overestimated HCHO mixing ratios over dense vegetation areas in South America and the remote Pacific region (background condition), mainly within the planetary boundary layer (< 2 km). The simulated seasonal variations in the HCHO columns showed good agreement (R>0.70) with the MAX-DOAS observations and agreed within the 1σ standard deviation of the observed values. However, the temporal correlation (R∼0.40) was moderate on a daily scale. CHASER underestimated the HCHO levels at all sites, and the peak occurrences in the observed and simulated HCHO seasonality differed. The coarseness of the model's resolution could potentially lead to such discrepancies. Sensitivity studies showed that anthropogenic emissions were the highest contributor (up to ∼ 35 %) to the wintertime regional HCHO levels.