EVALUAREA MATERIALULUI DE OBTURAŢIE DE CANAL RESTANT DUPĂ DEZOBTURARE, FOLOSIND PROTAPER ROTATIV CU SAU FĂRĂ SOLVENŢI

Abstract

The purposes of retreatment are to eliminate the cause for failure of initial endodontic treatment and to preserve the tooth as well. The aim of this study is a comparative evaluation of efficacy of Protaper rotaty retreatment instruments for gutta-percha removal with or without solvents specific both to the sealer and gutta-percha. Materials and methods: Forty single-rooted extracted teeth were randomly divided into 4 groups according to different methods of retreatment. The teeth were prepared with Protaper Universal system (Dentsply-Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) and filled using lateral condensation of gutta-percha and AH Plus (Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany). All root canal fillings were removed using Protaper Universal Retreatment system (Dentsply-Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland). During the retreatment procedure, in group 1 Resosolv (Pierre Rolland, Merignac, France) was used; in group 2 eucalyptol was used, in group 3 Endosolv E (Septodont, Paris, France) was used and in group 4 no solvent was used. The times required for retreatments and radiographycal evaluation after retreatment were recorded. Results: All root canals showed filling material remnants and group 1 with specific solvent for AH Plus recorded the shortest time. Conclusions: Although it is not possible to eliminate the entire filling material on the canal walls, the duration of retreatment was reduced by the use of a solvent specific to the sealer compared with a gutta-percha solvent or no solvent.