Abstract
Simple SummaryPoultry are euthanized for several reasons, most commonly because a bird is sick or injured and unable to eat or drink. Euthanasia can be a challenge to perform, especially when birds are heavy, like broiler chickens (produced for meat). Manual cervical dislocation (CD), or “breaking the neck”, is the most commonly applied method, but can be challenging. Therefore, using a tool (the mechanical method) such as the Koechner Euthanizing Device (KED) could be an alternative. Here, we aimed to compare CD with KED application for their impact on duration of induced reflexes and time to brain death. We assessed loss of brain stem reflexes, which indicate deep unconsciousness and/or brain stem death, and cessation of musculoskeletal movements. We applied both methods (CD and KED) to 200 broilers of 36, 42, or 43 days old on 3 experimental days. On days 2 and 3 an additional method was added, in which the bird’s head was extended at a ~90° angle after the application of the KED (KED+). Our study indicated brain stem death occurred sooner when birds were euthanized with CD compared to KED or KED+; all reflex durations were sustained for longer in the KED and KED+ birds. The aim was to assess the onset of brain stem death for two euthanasia methods—manual cervical dislocation (CD) versus the Koechner Euthanizing Device (KED). Over three days broilers of 36 (n = 60), 42 (n = 80), or 43 days old (n = 60) were euthanized. On days 2 and 3, a treatment was added in which the bird’s head was extended at a ~90° angle after application of the KED (KED+). On those days, gap size was recorded between the skull and atlas vertebra by 1-cm increments. The onset of brain death was assessed by recording the nictitating membrane reflex, gasping reflex and musculoskeletal movements (sec). Additionally, skin damage and blood loss were recorded (y/n). On all days, CD resulted in quicker loss of reflexes and movements compared to KED or KED+. Reflexes returned in 0–15% of CD birds, 50–55% of KED birds, and 40–60% of KED+ birds, possibly regaining consciousness. Skin damage occurred in 0% of CD birds, 68–95% of KED birds, and 85–95% of KED+ birds. On day 2 (p = 0.065) and 3 (p = 0.008), KED birds had or tended to have a narrower skull-to-atlas gap compared to CD and KED+ birds. Based on our results, CD would be the recommended method for broilers.
Highlights
Producers and veterinarians euthanize poultry on-farm for multiple reasons, yet most often because a bird is ill or injured [1] and unable to access food and water
This experiment was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Virginia Tech and followed SOP#10, “Euthanasia Methods Approved for Poultry”, approved by the IACUC at the U.S National Poultry Research Center (USNPRC)
This study showed a significant difference between Koechner Euthanizing Device (KED), KED+, and cervical dislocation (CD) euthanasia for duration of reflexes, onset of brain death, skin damage, and external blood loss, with KED and KED+ birds showing higher values for all measures
Summary
Producers and veterinarians euthanize poultry on-farm for multiple reasons, yet most often because a bird is ill or injured [1] and unable to access food and water. Animals 2019, 9, 47 of view, euthanasia should result in quick loss of consciousness, with minimal pain or discomfort. From an operator’s point of view, the method should be easy, safe, and mobile. Due to the vast number of chickens—including broiler chickens—kept in livestock production (circa 60 billion [2]), on-farm euthanasia occurs daily. A common method is to dislocate the head from the neck manually, resulting in extensive damage to the spinal cord and rupture of major blood vessels in the neck [3,4,5]. Cervical dislocation is assumed to be humane, brain electrical activity can persist for up to 30 s following cervical dislocation methods
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.