Abstract
This monograph is almost entirely devoted to the flexion structure generated by a flexion unit \(\boldsymbol {\mathfrak {E}}\) or the conjugate unit \(\boldsymbol {\mathfrak {O}}\), with special emphasis on the polar specialization of the units (“eupolar structure”). (i) We first state and prove the main facts (some of them new) about the central pairs of bisymmetrals pal∙/pil∙ and par∙/pir∙ and their even/odd factors, by relating these to four remarkable series of alternals \(\{\boldsymbol {\mathfrak {re}}_{r}^{\bullet }\}\), \(\{\boldsymbol {\mathfrak {le}}_{r}^{\bullet }\}\), \(\{\boldsymbol {\mathfrak {he}}_{r}^{\bullet }\}\), \(\{\boldsymbol {\mathfrak {ke}}_{2r}^{\bullet }\}\), and that too in a way that treats the swappees pal∙ and pil∙ (resp. par∙ and pir∙) as they should be treated, i.e., on a strictly equal footing. (ii) Next, we derive from the central bisymmetrals two series of bialternals, distinct yet partially (and rather mysteriously) related. (iii) Then, as a first step towards a complete description of the eupolar structure, we introduce the notion of bialternality grid and present some facts and conjectures suggested by our (still ongoing) computations. (iv) Lastly, two complementary sections have been added, to show which features of the eupolar structure survive, change form, or altogether disappear when one moves on to the next two cases in order of importance: eutrigonometric and polynomial.
Highlights
Introduction to the Polynomial ChessboardThe two sections venture beyond the eupolar into the polynomial and eutrigonometric domains, but unsystematically so, mainly with a view to showing which aspects of the eupolar situation survive and which do not
The indexation of the operators ari(diSri ) and arit(diSri ) goes in opposite directions, but this should not come as a surprise, since adari defines an action and garit an anti-action
Since according to (42), adari(S)±1 can be expressed in terms of diS, the above identity amounts to a sort of Campbell-Hausdorff formula for the composition of garidilators
Summary
The phenomenon is summed up by the following identities, which speak for themselves axit(A•) = amit(A•L) + anit(A•R), = ganit(A•R) . gamit (ganit(A•R))−1 A•L . The last two identities are easier to check in the following, equivalent form: gamit(A•).ganit(B•) = gaxit(C•) with CL• := A• , CR• := gamit(A•).B•,
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have