Abstract
A number of sociological inquiries over the last twenty years have demonstrated the pertinence and usefulness of an ethnographic approach to studying the relationship between library users and professionals, between the users and the “objects” on offer at the library, and between people and the spaces created for them. the interactions observed in libraries show the social ties of class and gender which, reinforced by the effects of age and generational differences, drive social segmentation from within the library. despite the sequence of reforms that have changed the mission of french libraries since the 1980s, there remains a vast section of the french population that never steps foot in a library, even if one is located close to home or where they work or study. since physical inaccessibility is not the problem, what is? During a round table at the conference of the Association of French Librarians (ABF) in June 2017, the issue of the social inequalities that are created and amplified by the relationship between library staff and publics and between books and publics was identified as one of libraries’ greatest challenges. librarians now admit that the “library apparatus” produces inequalities. it is an “apparatus” in the foucauldian sense, simultaneously a discourse, site and tool of power that aims to define, discipline and order knowledge; its structural characteristics themselves can deter the entrance of people unaccustomed to places of culture and thus favor their self-exclusion: imposing architecture, austere layout, minimalist decoration, coded displays and signs, majority female staff, and professional jargon are so many dimensions of a space that remains autoreferential and closed off. akin to schools in their link to written texts and established knowledge, libraries are socially-marked sites, expressions of separate territoriality within a neighborhood, city, or even a university campus. by proclaiming in every way and direction the absolute dominion of the written word, the library erects a silent but powerful boundary between those who master this realm of the word – absorbed as an aesthetic education more than it is learnt at school – and use it in their work, their free time, their culture, curiosity and emancipation, and those who dwell outside of the lettered, <i>de facto </i>socially-dominated world.
Highlights
In its attempt to reflect on professional practices in the library, the ABF conference examined this daily activity by asking questions of internalized routine and patterns, of the social prejudices and tendencies of the professionals as potential drivers in the production of inequalities [17] inside the library – all types of public reading establishments, including media libraries, libraries-on-wheels and university libraries [42]
To grasp the centrality of professional/user relationship in the library, we have chosen to use the results of ethnographic inquiries to create user portraits [42] and delineate ethnographic “scenes” [54, 44]. Thanks to these detailed descriptions, drawn from studies conducted in local libraries, downtown multimedia libraries, intercommunity multimedia libraries in suburban areas, and, university libraries, we propose to show that library professionals have 1) demands, 2) modes of communication, and 3) forms of mediation that adjust to the various publics they deal with, producing injunctions more or less likely to encouraging library use
Tackling the problem posed by the library space when it is designed around the book, for the book, and by book-minded people, Céline Leclaire, in charge of documentary policy and the adult hub of the Roubaix Multimedia Library, suggests that the library be organized like a lived space, starting from what the public does with the consoles, the keyboards, the screens, and video games
Summary
Officials in the service of the State, librarians embody this literary logic, champions of the written word and of the ideal of emancipation that reading provides, transmitters of culture in the dual sense of the term, legitimate culture and cultural democracy. Of the principal missions with which librarians are entrusted, one to which they are committed is the task of welcoming, assisting and orienting the publics in their choice of reading and cultural consumption, to promote the assimilation of resources by individuals and social groups of the territory in which the library is rooted. In its attempt to reflect on professional practices in the library, the ABF conference examined this daily activity by asking questions of internalized routine and patterns, of the social prejudices and tendencies of the professionals as potential drivers in the production of inequalities [17] inside the library – all types of public reading establishments, including media libraries, libraries-on-wheels and university libraries [42]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: American Journal of Information Science and Technology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
