Ethnic Communities and Ethnic Organizations Reconsidered: South‐East Asians and Eastern Europeans in Chicago

Abstract

A major debate continues about whether immigrants receive benefits by virtue of their attachment to ethnic communities and ethnic organizations. On one side of the controversy, a large body of literature suggests that the ethnic community, which often contains resources that promote immigrants’ adaptation and assimilation, actually hinders adaptation because the resources of mainstream institutions are less accessible to immigrants (often because they are also minorities). On the opposite side of the argument, critics contend that the ethnic solidarity school emphasizes the positive effects of ethnic communities and ethnic organizations on immigrant populations, while ignoring many of the negative consequences of migrants’ involvement in ethnic groups and ethnic institutions.The purpose of this article is to reconsider whether ethnic communities and ethnic institutions facilitate immigrants’ socio‐economic adaptation. Specifically, the study analyses the impact of ethnic organizations on public assistance utilization among South‐East Asian and Eastern European refugees in the Chicago metropolitan area in the late 1980s.The paper proceeds in five stages. As a background to the overall study, the literature on ethnic communities and ethnic organizations is reviewed. This is followed by a discussion of the development of mutual assistance associations (MAAs) in the US. Third is a concise description of the data and methods. Fourth is a presentation of the results. The article concludes with an assessment of the implications of the findings and suggestions for future research.