Abstract

This paper examines the experiences of two British students conducting doctoral fieldwork in Damascus, Syria. The cross-cultural nature of their work provides an opportunity to examine some of the assumptions which underlie specific principles of research governance in the UK such as anonymity, confidentiality and informed consent. Culturally variant understandings of notions such as privacy and permission-giving are explored, and the implications for social science research are discussed. Their experiences highlight the importance of understanding what constitutes locally acceptable research, and the concept of gatekeepers is critically examined. It is suggested that researchers are often ill-prepared for the complexities they may encounter in the process of gaining access, which often relies heavily on relational trust-building. The effect of power differentials on ethical procedures is explored, and the need to recognise the risk of both participant and researcher disempowerment is highlighted.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call