Abstract
This article attempts to present a critique of ethical and legal implications underlying at the moment of declaring an unconstitutional state of affairs against the problem of overcrowding in prisons by the Colombian Constitutional Court, highlighting not only the massive violation of fundamental rights, but also the indifference with which operate citizens in Colombia, relegating to a minority of the population becomes vulnerable to the residual treatment of society and a State that refuses to solve that problem, citing a budget deficit and an inability of its institutions to face them; attacking on many fronts the work done by the Court in this important decision.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
