Abstract
The ethics of compliance suggests a conflict within the definition of compliance. Evidence-based medicine appears to provide clear pathways for clinical decisions, but, usually, the patient is not a part of the decision-making process. Physicians often develop a treatment plan and then attempt to make the therapy acceptable to the patient to achieve compliance. Interventions are tested to change patient behavior, but few are designed to consider the patient’s point of view. Some suggest that the ideal patient is passive and obedient. However, few patients are either. The individual’s perspective and goals most certainly affect adherence with a medical treatment and cannot be ignored. This article reviews the ethics of compliance/adherence issues. Future research of compliance might be improved if studies were designed to include patient preference in a partnership with physicians.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
