Estrogen receptor α interaction of zearalenone and its phase I metabolite α-zearalenol in combination with soy isoflavones in hERα-HeLa-9903 cells

Abstract

Risk assessment primarily relies on toxicological data of individual substances, with limited information on combined effects. Recent in vitro experiments using Ishikawa cells, an endometrial carcinoma cell line expressing both estrogen receptor isoforms, demonstrated interactive effects of phyto- and mycoestrogens. The mycoestrogens, zearalenone (ZEN), and α-zearalenol (α-ZEL) exhibited significantly enhanced estrogenic responses in the presence of isoflavones (ISF), depending on substance ratios and concentrations. This study investigated the impact of phyto- and mycoestrogen combinations on estrogenic response following OECD guideline 455, utilizing hERα-HeLa-9903 cells. Test substances included mycoestrogens (ZEN and α-ZEL) and isoflavones (genistein (GEN), daidzein (DAI), and S-equol (EQ), a gut microbial metabolite of DAI). Mycoestrogens were tested in the range of 0.001 to 100 nM, while isoflavones were used at concentrations 1000 times higher based on relevant occurrence ratios. Results showed that ZEN and α-ZEL induced ERα-dependent luciferase expression in concentrations above 1 nM and 0.01 nM, respectively. However, ISF caused a superinduction of the luciferase signal above 1 µM. A superinduction is characterized by an unusually strong or heightened increase in the activity of the luciferase enzyme. This signal is not affected by the estrogen receptor antagonist 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OH-TAM), which was additionally used to verify whether the increase of signal is a true reflection of receptor activation. This superinduction was observed in all combinations of ZEN and α-ZEL with ISFs. Contrary to the luciferase activity findings, RT-qPCR experiments and a stability approach revealed lower real ERα activation by ISFs than measured in the ONE-Glo™ luciferase test system. In conclusion, the OECD protocol 455 appears unsuitable for testing ISFs due to their superinduction of luciferase and interactions with the test system, resulting in experimental artifacts. Further studies are necessary to explore structure–activity relationships within polyphenols and clarify the test system’s applicability.