Abstract

In 37 female patients with primary osteoporosis, urinary hydroxyproline excretion, determined in 18 24-h consecutive complete urine collections was compared with two radioisotopic measurements of bone resorption rate measured simultaneously using 85Sr. A somewhat better fit was obtained when the kinetically determined bone resorption rate was corrected for long-term exchange processes within bone. Regression analysis showed that the intercept of the regression of hydroxyproline excretion on resorption rate, corrected or uncorrected for exchange, was significantly higher than zero at about 100 μmol/day. This is consistent with a substantial fraction of urinary hydroxyproline arising from non-bony sources. Fifteen paired studies were analysed and the results suggested that intra-individual variability in these relationships (when studies were separated by a year or more) were similar to inter-individual variability. We calculated the precision with which an estimate of bone resorption could be determined based on the calculated regressions. As a means of non-invasive quantitation of whole body bone resorption rate, the excretion rate of hydroxyproline, measured over 5 days, for example, appeared competitive with isotopic methods making no correction for exchange and relatively little worse than our exchange corrected method.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call