Abstract

To assess the effect of treatment in survival studies, a randomized controlled trial (RCTs) is usually designed. Due to disease progression or other safety reasons, patients in the standard group may be allowed to switch to the experimental treatment. In such cases, estimation of the treatment effect is inevitably performed using naive methods such as intention-to-treat (ITT), per-protocol (PP), or more advanced methods such as the rank-preserving structural failure time (RPSFT) models or iterative parameter estimation (IPE). In some trials, people who progress early might be more likely to switch, and in other trials, people who progress late might be more likely to switch – depending on the characteristics of the disease and the drug being examined. So, this study simulated a new range of realistic scenarios with regard to patients’ prognosis and investigated the performance of the adjusted methods in the early and late switching with respect to the median of the survival time.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call