Abstract

The estimation of the time since death is a practical task in daily forensic casework. The estimation should be as precise as possible but first of all reliable. With increasing postmortem interval the estimation will be less accurate. The postmortem changes which are used for estimating the time since death are completely different in nature. The progression of postmortem changes is influenced by many internal or external factors, mainly the ambient temperature. The best investigated method of estimating the time since death is postmortem body cooling described by the two-exponential model of Marshal and Hoare and the nomogram method developed by Henssge. The rectal temperature time of death nomogram should be used as the leading method for estimating the time since death. However, in the best case, a precision of ±2.8h around the mean value (95% confidence limits) can be achieved. Therefore other methods of death time estimation should be used to narrow down this range further (electrical and mechanical excitability of skeletal muscles; chemical excitability of the iris; lividity and rigor mortis). Chemical methods and gastric contents are only of limited value in estimating the time since death. Putrefactive changes can be used for bodies recovered from water if the water temperature is known and was relatively constant over a long period.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.