Abstract
SummaryCount data arising in various fields of applications are often under‐reported. Ignoring undercount naturally leads to biased estimators and inaccurate confidence intervals. In the presence of undercount, in this paper, we develop likelihood‐based methodologies for estimation of mean using validation data. The asymptotic distributions of the competing estimators of the mean are derived. The impact of ignoring undercount on the coverage and length of the confidence intervals is investigated using extensive numerical studies. Finally an analysis of heat mortality data is presented.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have