Abstract
Electromagnetic induction measurements from multi-coil configuration instruments are used to obtain information about the electrical conductivity distribution in the subsurface. The resulting inverse problem might not have a unique and stable solution. In that case, a local inversion method can be trapped in a local minimum and lead to an incorrect solution. In this study, we evaluate the well-posedness of the inverse problem for two and three-layered electrical conductivity models. We show that for a two-layered model, uniqueness is ensured only when both in-phase and quadrature data are available from the measurements. Results from a Gauss–Newton inversion and a lookup table demonstrate that the solution space is convex. Furthermore, we demonstrate that for even a simple three-layered model, the data contained in such measurements are insufficient to reach a correct or stable solution. For models with more than 2 layers, independent prior information is necessary to solve the inverse problem. The insights from the numerical examples are applied in a field case.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.