Abstract

Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) systems can be used to estimate both vertical and horizontal forest structure. Woody components, the leaves of trees and the understory can be described with high precision, using geo-registered 3D-points. Based on this concept, the Effective Plant Area Indices (PAI(e)) for areas of Korean Pine (Pinus koraiensis), Japanese Larch (Larix leptolepis) and Oak (Quercus spp.) were estimated by calculating the ratio of intercepted and incident LIDAR laser rays for the canopies of the three forest types. Initially, the canopy gap fraction (G ( LiDAR )) was generated by extracting the LiDAR data reflected from the canopy surface, or inner canopy area, using k-means statistics. The LiDAR-derived PAI(e) was then estimated by using G ( LIDAR ) with the Beer-Lambert law. A comparison of the LiDAR-derived and field-derived PAI(e) revealed the coefficients of determination for Korean Pine, Japanese Larch and Oak to be 0.82, 0.64 and 0.59, respectively. These differences between field-based and LIDAR-based PAI(e) for the different forest types were attributed to the amount of leaves and branches in the forest stands. The absence of leaves, in the case of both Larch and Oak, meant that the LiDAR pulses were only reflected from branches. The probability that the LiDAR pulses are reflected from bare branches is low as compared to the reflection from branches with a high leaf density. This is because the size of the branch is smaller than the resolution across and along the 1 meter LIDAR laser track. Therefore, a better predictive accuracy would be expected for the model if the study would be repeated in late spring when the shoots and leaves of the deciduous trees begin to appear.

Highlights

  • Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/scs_articles Part of the Forest Sciences Commons, and the Plant Sciences Commons

  • Passive remote sensor systems cannot describe the 3D structure of leaf distribution with a single scene. They employ indexes of spectral characteristics, such as the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), which are derived from satellite imagery and aerial photography, and which fail to distinguish between woody components and leaves [12,13,14,15]

  • Returns by forest type were classified into two clusters according to the Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR)-derived crown base heights (Figure 4)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/scs_articles Part of the Forest Sciences Commons, and the Plant Sciences Commons. The leaves of trees and the understory can be described with high precision, using geo-registered 3D-points Based on this concept, the Effective Plant Area Indices (PAIe) for areas of Korean Pine (Pinus koraiensis), Japanese Larch (Larix leptolepis) and Oak (Quercus spp.) were estimated by calculating the ratio of intercepted and incident LIDAR laser rays for the canopies of the three forest types. A comparison of the LiDAR-derived and field-derived PAIe revealed the coefficients of determination for Korean Pine, Japanese Larch and Oak to be 0.82, 0.64 and 0.59, respectively These differences between field-based and LIDAR-based PAIe for the different forest types were attributed to the amount of leaves and branches in the forest stands. Leaf area index, plant area index, LiDAR, k-means clustering, gap fraction, beer-lambert law Citation: Kwak D A, Lee W K, Kafatos M, et al Estimation of effective plant area index for South Korean forests using LiDAR system. Due to such LAI effects upon numerous relevant ecological processes, of hydrology (capture, storage, and redistribution of precipitation), energy

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.